Vol. I · No. 1 · Est. 2026

Academic papers,
properly
distilled.

Upload a PDF or paste a DOI. Claude reads the paper and returns a structured editorial summary — background, methodology, findings, contributions, flashcards and an APA citation. In under a minute.

58s
Avg. extraction
14
Fields captured
Sonnet 4.6
Claude model
Fig. 1 · Before / After
Raw paper · 28 pages
Self-Supervised Contrastive Representation Learning for Low-Resource Clinical Imaging Without Manual Annotation (2024)
Abstract. In this work, we investigate whether…
…the proposed framework yields F1 = 0.872…
…outperforming strong supervised baselines…
…on three public datasets (ChestXray14, ISIC…
Paper · Extracted58s
Self-supervised contrastive learning for low-resource clinical imaging
Liu et al. · Nature Digital Medicine · 2024

A contrastive pre-training framework matches supervised baselines with 5× fewer labels across three datasets.

contrastiveSSLclinical AIChestXray14
§ Specimen

A summary that reads like a good review paper.

Every section is rendered with the same care a journal editor gives a featured article.

Published · Specimen Article

A Language Model for the Birds: Predicting Migration Patterns from Low-Resolution GPS Traces

Martínez, J., Hale, P., & Okafor, T. · Methods in Ecology · 2025

A transformer trained on 400K sparse tracking records predicts migration routes of three songbird species with 87% accuracy, halving the sampling frequency required for field studies.

migrationtransformersecologytrackingsongbirds
§ I. Background

High-resolution GPS tags remain prohibitively expensive for long-term songbird studies. Existing migration models rely on dense samples and break down at the low frequencies most researchers can actually afford in the field.

§ II. Methodology

The authors train a causal transformer on 400K tracking records collected from three species (Catharus ustulatus, Setophaga fusca, Hirundo rustica) and use masked-span loss to force the model to learn spatial autoregression. They benchmark against state-space and LSTM baselines on held-out seasons.

Two ways to
feed a paper.

Whatever you have — a downloaded PDF, a DOI, an arXiv URL — drop it in and we handle the rest.

01

Upload PDF

Drag and drop any research paper PDF. We extract text, strip references, and pass the cleaned body to the model.

PDF · up to 20 MBTry it
02

Paste DOI or URL

Works with doi.org, arxiv.org, nature.com, pubmed, and most open-access journal pages.

DOI · arXiv ID · URLTry it
§ Method

Three steps. Zero busywork.

I.

Submit

Upload a PDF or paste a DOI / arXiv URL. No bulk import, no fuss.

II.

Extract

Claude Sonnet 4.6 reads the paper and returns 14 structured fields plus five study flashcards.

III.

Read

Your summary renders as a printable editorial article. Export as PDF, Markdown or BibTeX.

§ Apparatus

Everything a reader
actually needs.

We built Papersumm for the moment you have twenty tabs open and forty minutes to triage them.

Structured extraction

Title, authors, journal, year, background, methodology, findings, contributions, limitations, future work — all typed.

Flashcard generation

Five study cards per paper. Flip them on the page or enter full-screen review mode.

APA citation

Ready-to-paste APA 7th edition reference, with a copy button right next to it.

Keyword tagging

Five domain keywords per paper, colour-coded pills, searchable from your library.

Export anywhere

Print-ready PDF, clean Markdown, and a BibTeX bundle of every paper in your library.

Library manager

Live search by title, author, or keyword. Sort, filter by field, delete in one click.

Covering every major discipline
MedicineBiologyComputer SciencePhysicsEconomicsPsychologyEngineeringLaw
§ Correspondence

Letters from the
research bench.

Papersumm cut my literature review from two weeks to two afternoons. The structured output slots straight into my notes.
Dr. Amara Okonkwo
PhD candidate, Molecular Biology
Karolinska Institutet
The flashcards are the sleeper feature. I review them on the train and actually remember the papers by the time I reach the lab.
Rohan Iyer
Research engineer, ML systems
ETH Zürich
My students finally read the assigned reading. The APA citation export alone is worth the subscription.
Prof. Helena Marques
Associate Professor, Economics
Nova SBE
§ Subscription

Pick a tier.
Start reading.

Two plans. No free tier, no trials, no credit-card roulette — just a straight trade for saved hours.

For the individual researcher

Scholar

$10/ month
  • 20 paper summaries / month
  • Full structured extraction
  • Flashcard decks & study mode
  • APA citation export
  • PDF · Markdown · BibTeX export
  • Private library, search & filter
Start with Scholar
Most popular
For labs, reading groups & seminars

Lab

$29/ month
  • Unlimited paper summaries
  • Everything in Scholar
  • Shared library workspace
  • Team seats (up to 5)
  • Priority Claude token allocation
  • Bulk import & bulk export
Upgrade to Lab

No free tier · No trial · Cancel anytime

§ Queries

Frequently asked.

Which languages does Papersumm support?
The extraction model is multilingual, so you can feed it papers in English, Portuguese, Spanish, French, German, and most European languages. The structured summary always renders in English for consistency.
What happens to my uploaded PDFs?
PDFs are stored in your private Supabase Storage bucket behind row-level security. Only you can read them. Delete a paper and the underlying file is scheduled for removal.
Can I cancel anytime?
Yes. Cancelling is one click in Settings and the cancellation takes effect at the end of the current billing period. We do not keep you hostage.
Is the summary accurate?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is currently the strongest model for extracting structured information from scientific prose. That said, always verify methodology and numerical results against the original paper before citing.
Do you offer a free trial?
No. We charge a fair, flat monthly rate and spend the money on model tokens. Commit for one month — if it does not pay for itself in time saved, cancel.